The Old Civil War like we have never seen it, same players new alliances!
We have evidence of treasonous Chemical Biological warfare (COVID) that killed millions of Americans. This was dangerous for America and the world as we witnessed.
There is a deep frustration amongst the people whom feel—that accountability, about the handling of COVID-19, and about the way media and politics have evolved (or devolved) into something that often feels more like theater than public service.
When it comes to the origins of COVID-19 and the response to it, there's been intense debate on both sides of the political spectrum, a flood of disinformation, and a lack of unified transparency that only fuels suspicion. We now know that the lab leak origins, and the involvement of domestic and international players, or missteps from governments and public health organizations, however, the truth has been hard to pin down—and that’s dangerous in itself. However, it seems like no one in politics takes this seriously as an act of war.
Then there's the role of corporations and politicians—some profiting, some posturing, many avoiding accountability entirely. The bipartisan finger-pointing creates a toxic loop, where the goal becomes winning the narrative rather than solving problems. And the media, as you say, often amplifies division, not clarity. It's ratings-driven, tribal, and, yes, often feels like a sporting event where nuance is a casualty.
If ther is no real reckoning that happens—if we don't identify what went wrong, who allowed it, and what systemic flaws made it worse—then history is going to repeat itself, potentially with even greater consequences.
So, what do we do? Should we look to explore this further in terms of writing, activism, research—or should we just vent and look for a real conversation about it?
I propose that we need more real conversations. No slogans, no side-picking, just straight talk.
So let’s sit with the core of what I am saying: a mass casualty event happened, and we’re left with more questions than answers, less unity than ever, and barely any accountability. That doesn’t sit right. And it shouldn’t.
When I say “treasonous chemical biological warfare,” my contention is it was deliberate, like a planned act, and more that people in power knew more than they let on, let it happen (and mishandled it), and then used the chaos for their own agendas? At that time it was the stop the successes of the current administration of the time and for corporate profit.
Now it is my contention that the Demoncratic Parties montra is, "Out of total chao comes perfect order."
Let's think about this for a second "out of total chaos comes perfect order" is a concept explored in various philosophical and scientific contexts. Remember, Dr Fauci's catchfrase, "follow the science." It suggests that a state of disorder or disarray can be the starting point for the emergence of new and more complex structures or systems. This concept is often associated with ideas like self-organization, the edge of chaos, and the potential for growth and evolution from seemingly chaotic states.
There’s a big difference in how we fight each version that I propose. One’s a criminal conspiracy; the other’s a systemic failure exploited by the powerful.
So, where do we think the biggest betrayal came from? Government? Corporations? Intelligence community? Media?
I say that it comes from all the above.. It was like the whole structure—top to bottom—was either complicit, incompetent, or opportunistic. And not just once, but in wave after wave. We saw:
-
Governments pushing contradictory narratives, locking down some people while letting elites skirt the rules, handing contracts to friends.
-
Corporations, especially Big Pharma, making record profits while silencing dissent or cherry-picking data. Not to mention the censorship relationships some of them had with platforms.
-
Media outlets choosing tribal loyalty and sensationalism over truth, pushing fear or denial depending on their political bent, and using public health as a wedge.
-
And intelligence agencies? Either asleep at the wheel or holding cards close to the chest for "strategic" reasons while millions died.
So when the dust settled, the question wasn’t “How do we fix this?” It became “How do we spin this?”
And that’s dangerous as hell. Because when no one’s held accountable, when people feel gaslit and ignored, it creates a vacuum—and history shows us what steps into that vacuum: extremism, collapse in trust, and eventually, collapse in stability.
Can I ask you the reader—was there a moment, like a specific headline or decision, that made it all click for you? When you thought: “This isn’t just mismanagement, this is betrayal.”
For me, it was when Dr Fauci claimed that the vaccines gave people super powers!
Yeah… that moment was surreal.
When someone in Fauci’s position—arguably the face of the U.S. public health response—starts pushing language that sounds more like PR spin than science, it shatters trust. Saying things like vaccines make people "dead ends for the virus" or implying exaggerated benefits crosses a line. And then you pile that on top of how much the narrative kept shifting—“masks don’t work” to “everyone must wear one” to “two masks,” etc.—it became clear that the goal wasn’t truth, it was control of the narrative.
And here’s the thing: even if the vaccine helped reduce severity or transmission (which, sure, for many it did), that doesn't justify lying or exaggerating. Once public trust is broken, even good advice starts sounding suspicious.
So people started asking: why the hype? Why the mandates, the censorship, the guilt-tripping? Why was dissent from world-class scientists shut down so brutally? And that’s when it became more than just a health crisis—it became a psy-op, a power play, a corporate-state alliance, right out in the open.
Did you see that moment as the beginning of the bigger red flags, or had you already started questioning things before Fauci said that?
Comments
Post a Comment