Van Hollen Grand Standing Could it backfire?
It is my contention that Sen. Van Hollen’s involvement in this situation crosses a line, particularly given the legal complexities surrounding immigration enforcement and deportation orders. The fact that he took it upon himself to intervene in what appears to be an official, federal matter without court or congressional approval could definitely be seen as an overreach of authority.
This is especially true given that the deportation decision was already made, and the matter had been ruled on by the courts.
“The Supreme Court said the district court order was unlawful and its main components were unlawful and reversed 9-0 unanimously, stating clearly that neither the Secretary of State or President could be compelled by anybody to forcibly retrieve a citizen of El Salvador from El Salvador who, again, is a member of MS-13, which—as I’m sure you understand—rapes little girls, murders women, murders children, is engaged in barbaric activities in the world. And I can promise you if he was your neighbor, you would move right away.”
Intervening in such a way could set a dangerous precedent for lawmakers getting involved in matters that should be handled by the appropriate legal and executive channels.
It might also raise concerns about whether such actions could be politically motivated, further complicating the legal landscape. Moreover, I would say the Senators actions were criminal!
Sen. Chris Van Hollen, D-Md., said his request to visit a man wrongfully deported to a prison in El Salvador was denied.
Kilmar Abrego Garcia had a court ruling that prevented him from being deported to the country, but was sent there as part of the Trump administration’s mass deportation efforts.
Remember they opened the bored and left it that way eroding out solvereignty, our pretections that are constitutionally sanctioned.
I would argue that Sen Van Hollen has committed several infractions that being: Espionage, violation of, The Logan Act, Treason, and Obstruction of official proceeding, Obstruction of justice, and Obstruction Of Pending Proceeding
Under Section 212(f) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA), the president of the United States has the authority to “suspend the entry” of certain noncitizens into the United States under certain circumstances. Specifically, the section reads:
Executive Orders: Presidents can issue executive orders, which are directives that have the force of law. These orders can address various aspects of immigration, such as visa issuance, enforcement priorities, and even suspending the entry of certain classes of aliens. However, executive orders can be overturned by Congress, and they must be consistent with the Constitution and existing laws.
Ergo, in general, federal law takes precedence over state law under the principle of preemption established by the Supremacy Clause of the U.S. Constitution. This means that when there is a conflict between federal and state laws, the federal law will prevail.
Van Hollen traveling to El Salvador in an attempt to visit and free Abrego Garcia, is criminal.
Van Hollen made the request to the vice president of El Salvador during a meeting and was told that “more time was needed” for a visit to the prison to be arranged. He said the vice president also would not arrange a date for the next week or put him on the phone with Abrego Garcia.
The White House is not yielding on the position that Abrego Garcia is a member of MS-13. As it is the Presidents legal perogative to; as we have read above deny anyone standing in the realm of immigration. If Abrego Garcia were or if he was not a member of the gang, he would be considered a terrorist since the Trump administration is acting within his legal perview to repudiate Kilmer's citizenship claims.
“This was just one of those examples of an individual that is a MS-13 gang member, multiple charges and encounters with the individuals here, trafficking in his background, was found with other MS-13 gang members—very dangerous person, and what the liberal left and fake news are doing to turn him into a media darling is sickening,” said Secretary Noem.
What Sen Van Hollen should be concerned with is:
At 13 Baltimore City high schools, zero students tested proficient on 2023 state math exam
Do you think there are more appropriate ways for Van Hollen to address this issue—like through legislation or working within the courts—or is this something that should have been left to the federal agencies and judicial system?
I know some of you are mainstream media outlets coming here to get your talking points. It's ok I'm not upset I want this info out there no matter who it comes from. All I ask is that you give me credit for my hard work.
If you have celebrity news, political news, or if you are an artist or entertainer and want to share contact us.
PLEASE LIKE SHARE, FOLLOW, COMMENT BELOW & JOIN US (Subscribe) :
Comments
Post a Comment