Are The Demoncrats are really trying like hell to force a civil war?

The U.S. Constitution grants the federal government primary authority over immigration, even though it doesn’t mention the word “immigration” explicitly. This power is derived from clauses such as the Naturalization Clause and the Commerce Clause in Article I, Section 8, which give Congress the authority to regulate citizenship and foreign affairs. The Supreme Court has consistently upheld that immigration enforcement is a federal responsibility, not a state one, as seen in landmark cases like Arizona v. United States. 

While many Americans support stricter immigration controls, the issue remains politically divisive. Demoncrats who oppose certain enforcement measures often do so based on self serving concerns, arguments of due process where there clearly are none, or the craving of continuous power—even if it  defies the Constitution. The debate over immigration policy reflects deep divisions and polarization of the American society, but the Constitution clearly assigns the power to regulate immigration to the federal government.

The people of the United States, the President, and this Congress wants the illegals out!

So why are the Demoncrats so hell bent on defying the will of the people?

If a majority of voters elected leaders who support enforcing existing immigration laws, including deportations through ICE, then those laws should be carried out—regardless of whether some lawmakers or interest groups like them or not.


That’s the principle of the rule of law: laws are not optional or suggestions, and no elected official gets to selectively ignore them based on personal agendas. If laws on the books—passed by previous Congresses and upheld by courts—making illegal entry a deportable offense, then the government has a duty to enforce them. Otherwise, we undermine the very foundation of our legal system. If laws can be ignored simply because certain officials or political factions disagree with them, then why have laws at all? Either we are a nation of laws, or we are a nation of politics—and if it’s the latter, then the rule of law is nothing more than a slogan.

Again, the Constitution explicitly states that... The authority over who may enter the United States derives from the U.S. Constitution, primarily from Congress's power to regulate immigration under Article I, Section 8 and the Executive's power to enforce the laws and protect the nation under Article II.

Congress provides the statutory framework through laws like The Immigration and Nationality Act (INA), which grants the President broad authority to suspend the entry of certain aliens.

The President then uses this statutory and constitutional power to direct enforcement actions, such as preventing the physical entry of individuals deemed detrimental to national interests.

"If we don't have a constitution no one is safe from total Tyranny!"  -WillyBill

Moreover, Federal laws prohibiting interference! 

Using its constitutional authority, Congress has established federal laws that prohibit interfering with the immigration process. These are codified in Title 8 of the U.S. Code and include offenses such as:

  • Alien smuggling: Transporting, harboring, or bringing non-citizens into the U.S. illegally.
  • Immigration fraud: Illegally obtaining or using visas, immigration permits, or other documents, including marriage fraud.
  • Document fraud: Creating or using fake passports, visas,  or other false identity documents.
  • Unlawful employment: Knowingly hiring or continuing to employ unauthorized non-citizens. 
Penalties for violating immigration laws
Penalties for immigration offenses can be severe and include fines, imprisonment, and deportation. The specific penalties depend on the nature and severity of the crime. 

He who has an ear let him hear! 

Y'all don't hear me though;

This is
- WillyBill, (The lone voice in the wilderness)

...And I'm out!

Please follow us:

Buzzsprout

Spotify

I know some of you are mainstream media outlets coming here to get your talking points. It's ok I'm not upset I want this info out there no matter who it comes from. All I ask is that you give me credit for my hard work. 

If you have celebrity news, political news, or if you are an artist or entertainer and want to share contact us.

PLEASE LIKE SHARE, FOLLOW, COMMENT BELOW & JOIN US (Subscribe) : 


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Philly Police Officer Moses Walker Jr. murdered on his way home from work

Image
Police in Philadelphia are searching for the gunman who shot and killed one of their own early Saturday morning. Authorities say Officer Moses Walker Jr. had just finished his shift at the 22nd district at 17th Street and Montgomery Avenue, when he said shot to death on a North Philly street a few blocks from her police station. The 19 year veteran, who was in street clothes, was found face down lying on his gun by fellow officers around 6:30 a.m. Saturday.  He was rushed to Hahnemann Hospital, where he was pronounced dead.  It is believed he was walking to a bus stop when he was murdered on Cecil B. Moore Street. Forty-year old Walker, who was not married and had no children, was also a deacon at Deliverance Evangelist Church at 20 th  and West Lehigh Avenue. No  arrests have been made Case updates: Mother sentenced, 2 men face trial Mayor Michael Nutter says goodbye to fallen Philadelphia police officer Moses Walker Jr. during a...
Read more

It’s Not Partisan Bickering — It’s Treason and Betrayal

Image
T he political establishment — from pundits and media to Congress itself — has long dismissed the escalating actions of both Democrats and Republicans as mere partisan bickering. But let’s be honest: what we’re witnessing goes far beyond petty disagreements. It’s betrayal. It’s corruption. And in some cases, it borders on treason. Hell,  Let’s stop calling it “bipartisan bickering.” What we’re witnessing is not politics as usual — it’s treason. trea·son /ˈtrēzən/ noun the crime of  betraying  one's country, especially by attempting to kill the  sovereign  or  overthrow  the government.  When elected officials sell out the interests of the American people, violate the Constitution, abuse power, and protect each other from justice, that’s not democracy — that’s betrayal. Politicians should be held to higher standards than the people they serve, not lower. Yet, when the Clintons managed to sidestep a litany of serious allegations, a dangerous prece...
Read more

The Federal Reserve Cartel: The Rothschilds

Image
The  Rothschild family  is a wealthy family descending from  Mayer Amschel Rothschild , a  court Jew  to the German  Landgraves of Hesse-Kassel , in the  Free City of Frankfurt , who established his banking business in the 1760s. Unlike most previous court Jews, Rothschild managed to bequeath his wealth and established an international  banking family  through his five sons, who established themselves in  London ,  Paris ,  Frankfurt ,  Vienna , and  Naples . During the 19th century, the Rothschild family possessed the largest private  fortune  in the world, as well as the largest private fortune in  modern world  history. The family's wealth was divided among various descendants and today their interests cover a diverse range of fields, including financial services, real estate, mining, energy, mixed farming, winemaking and nonprofits. The Rothschild family has frequent...
Read more